This page is a cont. of Government crimes on the Silicon Rainbow web site, but switched to my other web site Green Rooster because there is so many scanned documents there isn't enough memory on one. I apologize if anyone finds it difficult to navigate this information but remember it wasn't put here for your enjoyment, there are a lot of people being hurt by government bean counters who can't tell the difference between capitalism and democracy, what's good for them and the right thing to do.

I don't know which I should list first, the document concerning the law suit against congressperson Brad Sherman or the U.S. attorney's, but the last is a complaint against a police officer in L.A. Here's the stuff on Brad Sherman (D-24th distric L.A.) The first is the original lawsuit (actually you can't sue a congressperson, but the point is Brad Sherman does know now people have to use force to protect themselfs from gangsters in the government)Lawsuit complaint on Brad Sherman, congressperson part 1 Sue Brad Sherman part 2Now here's where one of my famous government reflex responses when I do get replies. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 The government lawyers knew a conressperson cannot be sued so they moved to have the case dismissed. now check out #2 again, line 2: 2. Line 2 says Brad Sherman only got ONE letter from me, but if you look at the letter: The March 1, 2002 letter You can notice I sent a lot of copies out. In particularly to congressperson Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-33rd). This congressperson replied not only to this letter but to three of them.Sep 18, 2001 Nature wouldn't let me keep all three replies. Call her at 1-213-628-9230 and ask her about her copies ( email me, siliconrainbow@yahoo.com, and I'll tell you why.) Did you notice Roybal-Allard's reply came six months before Brad Sherman got the March 1, 2002 letter. He lied to a federal court.

Next part of the plan was to sue the U.S. Attorney for also refusing to let me complain that I was not being allowed to vote (this is called: The FBI was refusing to protect my right to vote) Here's the first try:Complaint U.S. is refusing to protect my right to vote page one:and page two:Followed by the Federal courts rejection. As could be expected these two Judges can't the diffrences between an investigation and a prosecution. Deep in the bowles of the U.S. Attorney's office (and the U.S Justice Dept.) there are letters from a couple of years before that I made claim by actions of the Cal State UC Regents these Judges are not fit to know what their doing.I made another attempt, something similar to an appeal:2nd complaint.

The complaint against the police demonstrates how the citizens need to use defence if they are going to be guaranteed Due Process. LAPD Complaint The comlaind starts out as: when I asked the officer if he got the id facts about the PR (I don't even know what PR means!) he lied to me so I shoved him. Anyone interested can check with the Los Angelese Police using control number: CF# 03-2705

HOME